Revisiting Sync: From Pure to Pure (an Ideal) and From Pure to Escape (an Ideal)

Reiterated ideal of going along a path of 'returning' to a very pure soul that is always a good boy or girl after they did or thought some bad in their life, couple that with seeking higher whereat when the analog of knocking on the door to get to the High, knock who's there?.. so and so... turned down from entry to higher level, until eventually the answer that gets the person through door might not be what the seeker earlier expected. Up around there is one of the baselines or well known set of ideas, that serves as part of the backdrop for the comparison explained here.

On the practical level, what's going on today?, around us, our society, in spring of 2026? Especially here in the USA.

This blog post is intended to be a 5 minute jotting of thoughts, not a PhD thesis with grammar 'Flesch- Kincaided' pumped up, etc.

However, I'm pretty sure a lot of PhD candidates are going through, or if they aren't, might want to consider going through, motions that run along the lines of this discussion right through here.

What's going on, 2026...?

In 1970 Dr Heinz Hartmann passed.

'70s kid'. Studious folks may be familiar with the concept. If you look around, 70s babies are at the prime of holding influential positions and posts right around now. People that are in the age group of late 40s to early 60s, just before average technical retirement age (62), are prominent lawyers, doctors, authorities, law enforcement chiefs, etc.

70s kids parents, if the average parent had their child between age 20 and 30, had their previous generation known also as baby boomers, so 70s kids were the kids of 50s kids, and so on.

50s kids were the kids of WWII timeframe kids. WWII, kids those of WWI, and so on.

Hypothetically Dr Hartmann around the late 1960s, early 1970, may have been considered 'at the top of the heap and game' of aspects of the psychology field by aspects of the psychology field here in the USA, especially as it relates to society.

The idea of supreme or supremacy, in terms of the seasoned most scientist, and eldest for a genre, of those that were walking and talking in the practical sense.

'50s kids, the baby boomers, were the crop that was entering college or in college, finishing degrees etc, at around age 18 to 20, which fits the puzzle, logic, timeline, almost exact to the scissor cut. Right at that time, Hartmann was considered pretty much boss for psychology/society subject matters in certain academe.

Basically, if you're a 70s kid living in America and your parents were 50s kids the same, and they were going to colleges and top notch colleges back in the late 60s early 70s, there's a chance that they may have at least heard about ideas of Dr Hartmann, either directly or somewhere in the ripple pool of psychologist, neuroscientists, the ilk and group. Impacts varying. Scale of 0 to 10 for example.

There were a number of leading psychologists, students, lecturers, that were functioning in that time frame, many of which either knew or were aware of the others.



   Public domain off Wikipedia, that looks like it was from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/rr/print/res/118_freu.html
The link might not take you directly to photo, but the idea to is there.
As far as the picture, it's not the central theme of this write-up, but it did readily present itself and 'right there', so, go ahead and put it on in there, it'll only take a few seconds, deal.
What that photo is: 'English: Freud and other psychoanalysts : (left to right seated) Freud, Sàndor Ferenczi, and Hanns Sachs (standing) Otto Rank, Karl Abraham, Max Eitingon, and Ernest Jones'.


...Basically, if you're a 70s kid... there's a chance that some of Dr Hartmann's ideas 'came home', meaning were in the hindsight, in the foresight, and places in between, of how 70s kids were raised by 50s kids, how doctors and the police that were 50s kids, interacted with 70s kids, using psychoanalysis tools they were exposed to included in their basis. (Parents that did not raise their kids, neglect, and those vagaries included; this refers more to the generation, not the how well raised.)

[Might not be everybody everywhere, for example, households way out from cities in Native Reservations where the parents weren't sitting in the front rows of college auditoriums for hours 5 and 7 days a week being the audience of psychoanalytic theory promulgated by folks the Freud circles.]

What were some of those Dr Hartmann ideas?

Hmmm, ego... id... conflict-free sphere... adaptation... syntonic.

Stuff like that. Meaning, those are some of words found today in English, in, the answer to the question, (differentiated from, just the answer to the question).

Were there some times when focusing on id and ego, and adapting to conceptions of American folkways, the best medicine for a challenge, in day to day living?

If 990 out of a 1000 teenagers are all dancing to some popular songs at a concert with their hair dyed, wearing athletic shoes that costs the amount of a used car, say around 1990, does that make the 10 holdouts weird? Do those 10 holdouts, the 'abnormal' boys and girls, need to go to jail, says an 'educated' on psychoanalytic theory, law enforcement guy, or bounty hunter, (which may have been accompanied with an attitude and attitudeless attitude)?

At this point obviously no.

What if 7 out of the last 10 were all slapped with a label, psychiatrically ill, or having schizophrenia, because they must be 'split', schizo meaning split, into multiples, a normal teenager, that must be at concert with joke costing shoes, you pick a color other than brown, black, red or blonde for hair spray, listening to music that hasn't been heard about since 2 days after it came out, on the one end, and split forms when the other 'multiple' says, sit down, stay sober and under control?

Yeah, said softly, digressions might be involved here a little bit too.

'Normal' American kids for a time were expected to take a bath in the morning, comb their hair, put on some nice clothes that fit their or their parent's cloth, be respectful, go to school and act 'nice'.

Slowly over time, the normal kid, seen on the cover of toy box of some sort, combed hair, plaid button down shirt, jeans, at the movies with his soon to be wife, digressed to a rowdy rebellious with marriage the last thing on his mind.

Going back to, when 7 out 10 kids are 'psychologically troubled', per the dub of the local 50s kids, a.k.a. 'the system', either trying to tap their parents piggy bank by asking them to pay exorbitant fees to psych institutions, usually, the reality was healthy kids being robbed- the 3 kids left, are they to be jailed too because of all the nonsense?

What did go on from the 50s, to through the 60s, on through where we are today? Obviously there was a lot of convoluted trash that happened, that got mixed up in medical and psychological science, advances, but, where is the tracing back to the core of where the problems all began, or some of them?

As some readers already on thread have figured out, the staircase in reverse while doing the trace, may have gotten started before the 50s. There are folks still alive, might be older like 90 to 100 plus years old, that saw all this go down.

Quickly, here is what AI, artificial intelligence, results on Google have to say, as of about the time of this writing:

{Question/query:} What were political motivations and allegiances of Heinz Hartmann?

{AI responses:}

+8

Heinz Hartmann (1894–1970) was a prominent Austrian psychiatrist and psychoanalyst whose political motivations and allegiances were shaped by the need to escape Nazi persecution and the subsequent desire to establish psychoanalysis as a scientifically respectable, adaptable, and "Americanized" medical science. He is known as the key figure in the development of ego psychology. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Political Motivations and Context

Escape from Nazism: Hartmann’s primary political motivation during the late 1930s was survival. He left Austria with his family in 1938 to escape the Nazis, passing through Paris and Switzerland before settling in New York in 1941.

Adaptation and "Normalcy": Following his forced emigration, Hartmann focused heavily on the concept of adaptation to an "average expectable environment," as outlined in his 1939 work Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. This was partly a response to the upheaval he and other European analysts experienced, aiming to understand how individuals can remain "normal" or "healthy" in a changing, often hostile, world.

Opposition to Totalitarianism: His work on the autonomous ego—which emphasizes adaptation rather than solely instinctual, chaotic drives—has been interpreted as a contrast to the, at the time, growing influence of totalitarian, irrational ideologies that disregarded individual ego strength.

Americanization of Psychoanalysis: In the US, Hartmann and his colleagues (Ernst Kris and Rudolph Loewenstein) moved away from the more speculative aspects of psychoanalysis to align it with psychiatry and American medicine, emphasizing the ego's role in functioning and social integration. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Allegiances and Professional Influence

The Vienna Psychoanalytic Society: Hartmann was a student and follower of Sigmund Freud in Vienna and part of a key generation of followers that included Anna Freud, Ernst Kris, and Helene Deutsche.

Ego Psychology Triumvirate: In New York, he formed what was known as the ego-psychology triumvirate with Ernst Kris and Rudolph Loewenstein, which became the dominant psychoanalytic paradigm in America for over three decades.

Leadership Positions: He served as president of the International Psychoanalytical Association (1951–57) and the New York Psychoanalytic Association (1952–54), cementing his role as a leader in mainstream, "orthodox" (but heavily adapted) psychoanalysis.

Opposition to Lacan: Hartmann was a notable opponent of the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan, whose views on the ego contrasted sharply with Hartmann’s structural ego psychology. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Hartmann's work was considered to be a key, yet often criticized, attempt to integrate psychoanalysis into the mainstream, creating a more "optimistic" view of human nature that favored environmental adaptation over pure instinctual conflict. [1, 2]

Heinz Hartmann - Wikipedia

In 1938, he left Austria with his family to escape the Nazis. Passing through Paris and then Switzerland, he arrived in New York in 1941 where he quickly became...

Wikipedia

Hartmann, Heinz (1894-1970) - Encyclopedia.com

Hartmann was analyzed by Freud, and became a key member of his generation of Freud's followers at the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society (a group including Helene an...

Encyclopedia.com

Anna Freud & Heinz Hartmann's Contributions to Psychology - Lesson

Hartmann believed that children are born ready to deal with the demands of the environment around them. In other words, they can adapt to their environment, a p...

Study.com

Hartmann, Heinz - Encyclopedia.com

In 1939 he published his paper Ich-Psychologie und Anpassungsproblem, translated into English in 1958 as Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. Like Anna...

Encyclopedia.com

(PDF) From Ego Psychology to Modern Conflict Theory - ResearchGate

Feb 12, 2018 — Although Anna Freud would go on to establish herself in London in 1938, it would be in. America that her work took hold wherein ego psychology would become the ...

ResearchGate

Heinz Hartmann: Pioneer of Ego Psychology | PDF - Scribd

Heinz Hartmann: Pioneer of Ego Psychology. Heinz Hartmann was an Austrian psychiatrist and psychoanalyst born in 1894, known for his contributions to Ego Psycho...

Scribd

Narcissism and the “Relational Revolution” of the 1960s - Dialnet

Beginning with his famous “mirror-stage” lecture, delivered to the Marienbad psychoanalytic congress in 1936, Lacan argued that psychical development began not ...

Dialnet

Heinz Hartmann Facts for Kids

Oct 17, 2025 — In 1939, Hartmann wrote a very important paper. He showed that people often focused too much on mental conflicts. He pointed out that there is also a "sphere wi...

Kids encyclopedia facts

William Menninger and American psychoanalysis, 1946–48 - HAL

Mar 1, 2011 — Moreover, their participation in World War II, which many would later recall as the high point of their careers, led them to conceptualize psychoanalysis in way...

Archive ouverte HAL

Heinz Hartmann - Wikipedia

Heinz Hartmann (Austrian German: [ˈhartman]; November 4, 1894 – May 17, 1970) was an Austrian psychiatrist and psychoanalyst. He is considered one of the founde...

Wikipedia

Hartmann, Heinz (1894-1970) - Encyclopedia.com

Physician and psychoanalyst Heinz Hartmann was born in Vienna on November 4, 1894, and died in Stony Point, NY, on May 17, 1970. Hartmann's family had been dist...

Encyclopedia.com



~~~

Dr Hartmann, NY Psychoanalytic Institute. In 1939 did a piece of writing that was first published in German. Later translated into English.


~~~

Now on to begin reading


√✓


Perhaps without the afterthought of the maybe medicine in a spoonful, the help of what this post might be intended to do might not be accelerated --

🥄🥣

If you're a teenager going to school, it's okay to show up with your clothes ironed.

At lunch, it's okay to eat a good soup, or Challah bread, or have in the lunch box a combination of some fruits like a bunch of grapes or a few lychee.

🍇🍲🙂

Other students might poke fun; either a sandwich, school lunch, or local fast food lunch deal, (which these days can cost anywhere from $10 to $20, enough to gas a parent's car up with gas for half the week to get to work to pay for the school), is 'lunch'; anything outside that, regardless of what's best for the kid or what's healthy, is 'weird'.

Lunch break doesn't have to be inundated with music from a stereo blasting the latest set of noise, nor sneaking in illicit substances behind the school building.

You can sit cross-legged in a circle, have your pita, cheese, ground beef that was cooked at home, and relax. 
Students do not have to sit through the entirety of lunch, a half hour or hour, at their desk, eating pizza, which is pita, cheese, and ground beef with a label on it, while they lose circulation in their legs. And if they don't acquiesce, after the first few minutes of walking home, get picked up by the 250 pound bully called a bounty hunter that probably didn't finish high school, then when in some kind of building, a 'facility', start shoving all kinds of pills down the student's throat, sticking them with all kinds of needles, who knows what's in there or the ingredients, subjecting the student with all kinds of concepts, sometimes downright solicitation and child abuse coming from 'members of the untouchable above the law system'.


~~

Moderation. 
Literally running for your life, and when you get to safety, not sticking out like a sore thumb for safety reasons, such as not to catch the eye of could be attackers might have some wisdom, common sense.

Evading attack on the one end, but engaging in extremes of things that were done in tiny amounts from years past for safety, can be an extreme in itself.

Examples are wearing a religious cap out in public, or the old ask a question to the cashier at McDonald's, Arby's, Pizza Hut, Domino's, whether there's pork in the products at the group outing scenario. 
Students on a field trip
Soldiers in unit
Business persons on a group business trip

One of them asks, is there pork on meat lover's pizza?

The cashier says, not sure, will check, 2 minutes later comes back and says, there's beef, pork, and chicken on the pizza. 
Can you leave the pork out on mine? Is there an option?

The group leader, whether supervisor, teacher, or military leader pulls that person aside, and says, you're fired, going home, or sit on the bus he rest of the time. You go hungry. Your job is jeopardy. The preach of you're weird and don't fit in conversation starts up.

Everybody signed the nondiscrimination agreement.
But the content of the agreement got ignored.


It's 2026.


--


Sure, the extreme left, extremists included, can attempt to use this and many other things in their plans. That's bound to happen as an expected expectation.


What's Going On? What (Really) Went On? The Hurt in the Russia Ukraine Situation of Today, Reflecting the Hurts About 100 Years Ago; Generally, Globally, WMD and the Minds of Man, Then and Now.

Who tested what and when? Aside from the discussion of fine line in the sand between testing and actually bombing, who bombed who, where, and when? Today's (February 2026) media view of global relations and history, is it really the truth of what has happened even considering events as recent as WWI?

Why is this relevant?

The start if 2026 has several ugly ruts or stalemates on the global relations level, but the lives lost are not stale, it keeps going. 

Major situations right through here are:

Situation of Russia and Ukraine involving weaponry.

Discomforts in the Middle East, Markedly Palestine, Israel, Iran, while potentialities of unrest exist in other regions such as Syria.

So is it really true a simplicity that Russia is a mammoth that has always been, and it is wisest that it shall go untouched, perhaps the home of the historic woolly mammoth, respective size of the nation geographically and military might?

It turns out that essays, investigations, and evaluations of all these questions, from WWI on through 2/2026, have been done which expose some truths not often seen in today's media, and, those essays did not take into consideration a broader range of events that could affect a perspective.

Keep in mind that back in the WWI era, information sharing on a global level isn't what it's like today. It might have taken years or decades for the people of one country to know the deeds of another country. Especially events like testing and dropping bombs.

Meanwhile, propaganda and how a bunch of 'highly educating' books were being churned out, which left the 'highly educated', undereducated.

Here is a brief look at some of the topics, that when studied altogether at the same time, without one-sided propaganda, might affect the lenses and perspectives of what happened from the timeline hallmarked by terms like Bolsheviki, WWI, WWII, and the major events and developments of today:

American Expeditionary Force Siberia or AEF-S

'was a formation of the United States Army involved in the Russian Civil War in Vladivostok, Russia, after the October Revolution, from 1918 to 1920. The force was part of the larger Allied North Russia intervention. As a result of this expedition, early relations between the United States and the Soviet Union were poor.'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Expeditionary_Force,_Siberia

Rarely if ever, has grade school material been out in front of me that says along the lines 'nearly a couple of hundred US troops died in the cause, here is the list of veterans'; I haven't heard it from any other student, from any school, anywhere, any time.


Recurrent question, what's Romanovka?, or which is which?

'The Battle of Romanovka was fought in June 1919 during the Russian Civil War. Russian Bolsheviks of Yakov Tryapitsyn launched a surprise attack on an American army camp at Romanovka, near Vladivostok.'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Romanovka


Yalta Conference


Lop Nur or Lop Nor testing, when was it?

-Online information may generally point to a start of about October 1964 with over 40 tests spanning through the mid 1990s.


Russian bomb testing, when was it?

   -Briefly, fast access online sources might say, 

   RDS-1 or "First Lightning" (designated "Joe-1" by US), on August 29, 1949. The test took place at the Semipalatinsk Test Site in Kazakhstan. 


Nakasaki/Nagasaki and Hiroshima bombings, when were they?

   -Generally, early August 1945


Essays written: 

In the referenced book, before, including, and around the essays 'A Military Necessity' (Feis), and Paterson's 'American Expressionism and Power'.

May beg a question such as, what accounts for lack of information on Lop Nur and Russia testing in these?

(Maybe there is down in there somewhere, but expounding paragraphs didn't seem readily noticeable.)

From the intro of the chapter 'The Atomic Bomb and Diplomacy', (Vol II of Major Problems in American Foreign Policy...Docs, Essays),

'Authorized...on populated areas because that was the only way to shorten the war and save American lives. Until the 1960s most historians accepted that conclusion. But recent scholarship,  although not denying the argument that American lives would have been spared, has suggested that other considerations also influenced American leaders: relations with Soviet Russia, emotional revenge, momentum, and perhaps racism. Scholars today are also debating why several alternatives... we're not tried.'

Along with obviously I'm further behind in my readings than I should be, (I'm probably not the only one), the statement in that intro says, the concept is nothing new. The book was published in 1978.

What's this about encroachment towards being un-American if flow doesn't go with certain individuals, certain plans?

Maybe some folks grew up with parents or grandparents that were impressions youths back in the 1960s, and the warplans was the say all folkway, in order to truly have fealty to America.

Then again there's strong argument to that as the turbulent 60s probably wouldn't have been turbulent if everyone agreed on everything.

I never grew up to hold or express racism against anyone, whether they be from the Far East, Far West, nor aspects of myself and own history, or own people/s. I'm not going to start, the racism etc, anywhere in the timeline from 1978 on through the future.

That's the way of the ultimate heights of peace.

Pro tem notes until more info found...

It might take a few lifetimes to get everything in to make an anywhere near reasonable assessment, of the wraparound of parts and pieces involved - with a number of things

Stuff keeps cropping up on the Internet about:

...

Stuff seems to not be cropping up on the Internet about:

...

My acquaintances are few, levels of communication minimal in some areas, for good and smart reasons. 

There is the concept/s of elect, elected, selected, and so forth. Who are those that deselect for the lime light positions, such as power?

I remember some readings in English from the famous Hazrat's famous book, translated goes something like, once you found out who power us in the hands of, you'll be very upset.

Sensei.. Sensei ..(?) Ed Parker, ref Kenpo, used to say, 'The Truth will make you mad'.

I'm not sure whether a lot of folks that have positions of power, especially in America today, even know some of what it is that they got involved with, in terms of 'rides'

Some of those 'rides', may not have been the initial esteemed outlays such as having an independent America, that notables like first President Washington initiated.

I think of the battle at Red Hook

A one big wash set of thoughts these days, as more and more is found, have in there altogether, massive amounts of narcotics, massive amounts of frauds, I'll use of mainstay services like roads, TV and information, transportation companies, insurance schemes way up into the trillions of dollars, and good guys and bad guys in the military.

Suggestion, to youth especially, is stick to honorable ways of George Washington.

Here come prospects of shutdown in the news again.

Meanwhile, every detail of what is involved with organizations like U-Haul, recorded as founded by veteran, + every detail of what was involved with people that used U-Haul trucks for various activities.

There's a roll back that goes back for, an estimate to work with, but not the only, us the past half century.

Then there's Yerida. How much study could conceivably be done to encompass every Yerida case?

Then there's a bunch of big wigs in the 1970s and 1980s used to 'crash into each other at the grocery store', in the DC and surrounding suburb area, and no one at the time paid it much mind. A lot of those folks are now being discussed in chapters of history, or historical figures.

There might have been a break, and sharp turn headed left, that a ride got started, or a bunch of rides, today relabeled as normal, politically safe, the right thing to do. The story of the normal that cut off an ear to fit in as normal under social construct pressure.

Read, be true, have a clean heart constantly, and a lot of troubles that recurrently appear today, might not be on your path.

Gaining knowledge is ongoing. Major events, such as major wars and 9-11, various tumultuous events like prison camps, and wars thousands of years ago that may have seen the loss of the population of nearly entire nations, and different social constructs on a global scale, moreover history repeating itself over and over especially today at frivolous levels, for most of us, will always be something out there for us to look into.


Dangerous, Irksome, Hackneyed, But Little Understood and Underpenalized :Ties Between Transnational Terrorist Groups and Whomever Else Complicit, or Acquiesce or Tacitly Facilitate Their Aims

As much as East Africa has jeweled admirable qualities, civilizations at the mouth of the Nile, and that many legendary people that formed the out wrapping of the pillars of civilization that have lasted thousands of years on through today, unfortunately a relatively few folks, especially for this paragraph, in the region that is formed by the area around the intersection of the Sahel and the Nile, are basically the rotten apples that are really blowing and ruining their people, now, and their people's future.

Did greed and other lusts get the best of them, regardless of what the 'pathology' is to the problem, the problem of facilitating terrorism, is as said, a large scale global problem.

In looking at the title of this blog post, what is summarily being talked about are the weak handshakes, regardless of whether they actually physically took place or not, between terrorist groups, distributed all over the earth.

There are at this present time, what could be discussed as the salient, well known to the media, or popularly known major ones, such as ISIS, Al Qaeda, and Al Shabab.

The other really bothersome dimension to what the earth is contending with, are politicians all over the earth that play in the handshake game, perhaps for monetary gain, political rise, power, lust for drugs and drug power, ideas about race based power and races rising and falling in greatness, and in some case just flat out wrongdoing and plain misguidance.

Questions are being asked right through here, like, why sue your country's leader the day after a government shutdown that crippled financially thousands of folks that help take care of him/her/them in ways they probably do not even know, finally draws to a close?

Sometimes who people are, really are, has little to do with outward appearance, the picnics they show up at, the business suits they wear, or political office they hold. Some folks are working for forces that have nothing to do with the country they are claiming to be a part of.

As far as a reading list, which is what this blog is supposed to be doing, here's one of the articles in the 2+2+2= what mystery, not to be disrespectful, but if 1+1+1 does not equal 3 in someone's book, then they might need to be on the list of people that need to be checked as complicit in terrorism and a threat to security right on in there with terrorist groups and the pandering fake politicians playing the game for aims some of the time.

Article 1: https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/al-shabab-somalia

Read through that, then look at the next link. To be continued.


It would be different if it was just one incident; the same sign shows up week after week.

Standard history reading 101, the focus of the following Wikipedia article made history, and had numerous ties. Perhaps, for those newer to the field of digesting transnational terrorist group ties, or just readers of the news, 'start here', https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_the_Jackal

In 2025, Kashmir is another place, like the western boundaries and regions that may overlap the old Kingdom of Punt, that is currently in the process of being spoiled.

Times after Karbala. Regions near the people of the pure, standards of angelic folkways that many on the earth cannot even access.

Drug of choice in the last few years have shifted from medicines to straight up heroin and hashish. ?...__ numbers like increase if over 1,000% in narcotic use. Addiction problems. 

How did that occur? It wasn't all by itself, materialized by a little old lady sitting in the hills that does nothing but play a harp and say prayers.

(Trade. Trafficking. Cultivation.) Who were all they, and where are they?

Basic article to look at here. Of doing your own research might yield more information. https://kashmirobserver.net/2025/07/28/the-growing-drug-crisis/

A relatively few, bad apples, is a startling growing number.

The suggestion is stop it now while it's still a relatively few, or less than the majority, as it appears now, before it's the other way around.

The man that cut off his ear to fit in and be normal, well there is a true story where something like that happened; last thing the earth needs are law abiding individuals thrown in jail for refusal to be drug abusers.

What is What...

This blog post will be put on my personal page.

Thiql issues

Referring Books, Injeel from Gospel etc


(People can't use Blogger for decadence while the on other end are words to the right, on here, at the same time, as though all in the same footing)

ج ل د - Carryover from Skin Conditions Page: Back to Word for Word Meanings of Quran. Comment Set 3.

When start a process, when to stop a process. When to instruct yourself to stop or start, a motion, or even a defense against disease, - a process, can be a crucial arrangement to the health of a part of parts or of course whole, setting forth a little bit also reference to wholistic health ideas.

This post builds on the previous 2 posts, 1 and 2, Carryover from Skin Conditions. In a way it can be a Part 3.

A renown high up scholar taught that the best way to learn Quran such as its meaning, is to use Quran, basically original Arabic for original Arabic.

There could be a zone where mistaken or misapplication of a meaning or nuance could occur if misguided.

Bluntly for brevity, using haphazard translations, some of the time, haphazardly, then telling yourself, I've got it, got the meaning, and proceed on to use a meaning in English used for one place, set the translations aside, and see the word or letter arrangement again in another location/s and apply. If not under correctness/ proper guidance, - the pitfall of misinstructing, might, (not saying it would for 100% as some forces of nature keep doing as they're supposed to), occur, to some degree. 

§

ج ل د

So when the letters are connected, Arabic going from right to left, g sound, l (L) sound, d sound. 

To the chase for those interested, often translations in Quran when:

...جلد

are flog/lash, some may say in 'verb', 'noun' forms.

...جُلُود...

when the (waw) in there, it is often translated as skin or hides, like animal hides.

Hence, perhaps, not to erroneously lash when to make use of skin, and vice versa.

~|

An idea, is to 'get it' (not miss the point/meaning). Saying this politely, as once at the level where you can read Quran in Arabic and when you see translations,  can asses those translations as just that, translations or attempts at it, (reference slightly to discussions that can be found on the untranslatable). That level, read and understand in original Arabic, the ideal.

Every time you see ... translated once as lash, as already discussed, simply say lash?, after seeing tent as a translation once, every time use the translation tent? [- of course, before rushing off in a direction haphazardly, please use sound and correct guidance]

 

~|


(I use, carefully, nuance differences instead of just 'different meaning' or 'different word', because, of what could be.)

Arabic Wikipedia articles seem to have some information.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fur_clothing#:~:text=Fur%20clothing%20is%20clothing%20made,from%20the%20fur%20of%20animals.

Products of animal skin from Antiquity to the Medieval Period

https://www.jstor.org/stable/26342924


Kurbash

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurbash


كُرْبَاجْ

Transliterated- Kurbaj 


سوط [translated- whip]

https://ar.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B7

"

السوط (الجمع: أَسْوَاط، سِيَاط) ويسمى في العامية الكِربَاج (الجمع: كرابيج) هو شريط مفرد أو شرائط من الجلد المجدول يستخدم لإصدار صوت مفاجئ عالي لحث الحيوانات على التحرك أو العمل، كما توجد أنواع أخرى تصنع من الجلد أو الشعر المجدول وتستعمل كأداة للسيطرة أو العقاب أوالتعذيب أو كسلاح

...في القرآن

"

Translated into English from Google's system:

"

A whip ( plural : whips, whips), colloquially called a lash ( plural : krabij), is a single strip or strips of braided leather used to make a loud, sudden sound to encourage animals to move or work. Other types are made of leather or braided hair and are used as a tool for control, punishment, torture, or as a weapon . 

In the Qur'an...

"

Whips were used in Arabia long ago made from animal hides or skins, according to some history sources.


عرض. Carryover from Skin Conditions Page: Back to Word for Word Meanings of Quran. Comment Set 2.

عرض
How to look at it.
How to apply it.
How to look at it when here, how to apply it when here, and then the same inquiry set for when somewhere else; pronunciation marks and other letters connected to it varying.

Once again, maybe, as though looking around a corner and extending your arm to crack open a door a peek inside of a room, inside that room or if it is a door to outside, there is a good chance there is some light or sunshine there (upon strong understanding of the subject here, -~willing, 'in shaa...lh').

To your health.

Revisiting Sync: From Pure to Pure (an Ideal) and From Pure to Escape (an Ideal)

Reiterated ideal of going along a path of 'returning' to a very pure soul that is always a good boy or girl after they did or though...